|
|
|
Seasoned Vet
Group: Community Supporter
Last Login: Today @ 1:10 AM
Posts: 5,234,
Visits: 3,761
|
|
This article was wrote by CSM Purdy after he retired and before "The Army of One" article
LEAD BY EXAMPLE
First of all as you well know I have a different perspective on what senior CSM¹s should be doing Leading by example starts at the top. I believe they should be chief trainers, not politicians who are interested in working at higher levels, but totally dedicated to training soldiers for war. There is only one-way this is accomplished, and that is to lead by example. The SMA has the perfect opportunity to do this on a grand scale At this time I would like to point out that this is not a bad mouthing session of the SMA, or previous SMA¹s. They received their marching orders, and followed them to a tee. The SMA¹s boss the Chief of Staff of the Army should support him in every effort to continually visit, and train with soldiers. The SMA should have to be Airborne qualified so he can execute parachute operations, and perform Jump Master duties with airborne units. The following is my concept of Lead by Example.
First of all I would never serve under a Commander who does not support me traveling to units and training with them. My words to the Army would be drive on, do nothing special, and I need a basic load of ammunition if you¹re conducting live fires. I will be spending 3 days in the field with you. I am not coming to tell you how to fry eggs, but hopefully be of assistance. When the head of the horse trains with troops, and lives in the dirt with them he can speak, and all will listen. When the head of the horse flounders the body suffers. The philosophy of I have done all that, or I am to old is horse doo, doo. If that¹s the case than you have no business in the Army. I also would be deployable as in going to war with the main effort. If unit x is jumping into country x to execute a live mission then I should be the first man out the door locked and loaded. If you can¹t face fear, then why should your subordinate soldiers, or other senior trainers? I would be another rifleman with a squad not the squad leader. This inspires soldiers, and you can be of great assistance. Oh you say you are doing the unit CSM¹s job. ABSOLUTELY NOT. Hopefully I would be invited out of respect.
My mission would be to support all trainers, not do their mission for them. They are perfectly capable of that with the right leadership. Doing the above gives you the ability to inform your commander of the real deal. When you leave that unit you make damn sure the Commander, and CSM knows exactly what will be said to your boss. If you ever eat cheese on a Commander or NCO
you have lost total credibility.
Moral courage is an absolute requirement for leaders. This can be painful. You may be telling your Commander what he doesn¹t want to hear. If he is a good leader he will listen. You had better have a recommendation. Remember as SMA the soldiers belong to you. Commanders’ command. They make the final decisions. This also takes moral courage. Yes men bring nothing but discredit upon units. They are self- servers who aspire to them selves, and soldiers suffer for it. When training with units I would ensure that the leadership is given due credit. For example make sure you let the soldiers of that unit know that their leaders are competent. This is reinforced with the relief of sub standard leaders Officers, and NCO¹s. The SMA nor the
Chief of Staff should not tolerate sub standard leadership at any level.
The Chief of staff should put an order out immediately that informs
Commanders at all levels that they are to relieve subordinates immediately if they are sub standard performers whether they are Officers or NCO¹s. He should immediately get rid of all paper work requirements to do this. You are promoted with special trust and confidence. If this is the case why do leaders have to write books about sub standard performers to eliminate them from the service? Your word is either good or it isn¹t. Let¹s stop covering our Asses with paper. Let the cry- babies cry all the way to the gate. Right now we bend over backwards for perverts, and bums while everyone else suffers. I would STRONGLY recommend getting rid of sensitivity training. If a soldier is fat or goes down town, and punches some dirt bag its see you around. If you¹re a pervert, and brag about it we will have sensitivity classes to protect you. If you have a chip on your shoulder, and want to be a victim we will help you with that. We will pit you against each other. The Army of One. ME, ME, ME screw everybody else. Political correctness is sickening. The word supervisor needs to be eliminated! We are leaders! Let¹s have an Army of Warriors! OOOOH that would scare people. You bet it would.
It would scare away the self-servers who have no interest in serving their country. The Army is not supposed to be an experiment for the liberal cause.
WAKE UP!
Basic training needs to be segregated. Co-ed basic doesn¹t work. We have already proven that. Men and women are different, and when you put them all together in these situations things are going to happen. I am in no way defending the disobeying of current regulations. All I am saying is lets not complicate things for everyone. I would also recommend that if we are going to use the term equal then let¹s make it equal. The same standards for everyone. Right now equal means one standard for women, and another for men.
I know the liberal answer for this is we have the same standards for men, and we have the same standards for women. If that is the case then segregate the two. I am now labeled a chauvinist pig, and probably a homo phoebe.
Isn¹t it strange liberal leadership has a label for everyone who disagrees with them, but if you do that as a conservative you are mean spirited.
(DOUBLE STANDARDS!) GET RID OF DOUBLE STANDARDS! The Army is not around to please everyone. It¹s not a place for just anybody. OH NO I just said that everyone can not be a soldier. That¹s right that¹s what I said. Some bodies feelings might get hurt. Of course our enemies would never hurt any ones feelings would they? Lets quit carrying cards around in our pockets for stress. Let¹s train people to be SOLDIERS. Let¹s get their undivided attention, and make them perform to standard, or go back to the block. Let¹s make D&C a critical task. (15 count manual of arms) It would be a shame if we could march, and shoot. We might have discipline, coordination, and the ability to kill the enemy. Leadership, and good hard realistic training makes good soldiers. It inspires them to reenlist. Hats, gimmicks, and gadgets do not. Prompt obedience is not robotic. You screw around on the battlefield, and you die. Hesitation kills people. If we have leaders who don¹t know what a legal order is then get rid of their ass. Leaders lead, and followers follow, and learn to be good leaders.
I would recommend getting rid of up or out. Everyone is not going to be a good leader. This was another feel good deal. I can hear it now. Everyone in our Army is a future leader. Bull shit. If that were true we wouldn¹t have sub standard training, and personnel who are stripe bearers instead of being
NCO¹s. It all goes back to this theory that every body has to feel good. Soldiers feel good when they have lead by example leaders who provide hard realistic training. I would let the boss know that liberalism has destroyed the moral fiber of the Army, and it¹s ability to properly instill discipline into the soldier. Punishment needs to be firm but fair. When necessary punish the offender. Let the NCO Corp take care of punishment that is none judicial without having to notify, and beg some high level Commander to do it. Right now we are in the zero defect mode. One mistake and you are ruined. That is robotic! Working a soldier in the evening, or weekends to mow grass, clean latrines, inspections or conducting D&C is not inhumane punishment. I believe in some places it probably is considered that. The company ISG¹s and the CSM are capable of doing this properly without being micro managed. It¹s simple call JAG and they will tell you exactly what you can do, and what you can¹t do. Be smarter than the bears you are dealing with. Punishment is the best form of rehabilitation. For those drug offenders, chronically disobedient personnel kick their ass into the street.
I would recommend that BN Commanders be able to do that on one piece of paper. Numbers do not make a good Army. Well-disciplined, and well-trained soldiers make a good Army. I would sooner go to war with 300 well trained, and disciplined soldiers than to go with 600, and half of them are sub standard.
I would definitely recommend revamping the NCO school system. My recommendation would be that in order to become a NCO you would have to be able to train soldiers for war. I would recommend two courses. A junior NCO course, and a senior NCO course. Ninety percent field training, ten percent garrison. Light Infantry is the vehicle. What about the females? Again segregate. They have a separate course run by female NCO¹s. These courses would be run at Division level. To attend the junior course you would be a SP4 being considered for promotion to Sergeant. During this course you would be a Corporal. You would be placed in leadership positions up to Squad leader level. These courses should be 6 weeks in duration.(7 days a week) if you fail to meet the standard you do not get promoted. That¹s right you would have to be recommended to attend the course again. In order to attend the senior NCO course you would have to be a SSG being considered by DA for promotion to the senior ranks. You would perform as a PSG, and ISG. If you fail to meet the Standard you are no longer considered for promotion. Yes I said six weeks. No going to college during these courses. These are courses are dedicated to weeding out the weak who are not capable of being leaders. You perform or you don¹t. You got it there is no gray area. No SGM academy. When you are considered for SGM you should by that time know how to lead, and train soldiers for war. SGM¹s don¹t need degrees. They don¹t need to be worrying about geo politics, or some other politically correct BS. Oh you say this guy doesn¹t care about education. YES I DO, but the mission has priority. Do like I did and get with the education center and arrange for classes in the evening at your unit.
NCO rank needs to be put back on the sleeve where it can be seen. The class A uniform has too much stuff on it. All we need is our rank, name, war ribbons, and unit patch. It should be tailored with a belt. The tropical khaki uniform needs to be brought back into service. We don¹t need umbrellas for men. We don¹t need green shirts with ties with your 201 file on them, and call it class B¹s. We need to roll our sleeves up on the BDU¹s instead of going through this process that is conducted now. YOU ROLL YOUR SLEEVES DOWN BEFORE YOU GET INTO THE FIELD. We don¹t need ear plugs hanging off our duty uniform. Place them in your one -quart canteen cover pocket. Leaders inspect your soldiers before training is conducted. Yep I can hear it already "It¹s easier to see them if they are hanging on the persons uniform" It¹s not a part of the uniform. Yes uniformity is important just as teamwork is, and prompts obedience. Don¹t start with that robotic garbage. The only robots I know are liberals. They are lock stepped even if it¹s wrong or against the law. We watched it happen for eight years. Leaders and their followers are not robotic. That¹s why we have AAR¹s, and ask for feed back at appropriate times, and no the heat of battle is not time to be questioning orders. That¹s why we should train for war not peace. Good leaders have a chain of command that works both ways. Good leaders are not politically correct. Good leaders are not testing the waters they are doing what is right even if it hurts. THE SOLDIER COMES FIRST! He is yours you damn well better take care of him. Every parade should have every unit conduct the 15-count manual of arms. D&C is the foundation of discipline! If you can¹t march you can¹t be a soldier. I can hear you liberals chomping at the bit. If there is anything you liberals hate is any form of discipline, and having anyone know the difference between right, and wrong. You are comfortable in the gray murky area where you can put band- aids on every thing, control the way people speak, and lets all be equally screwed up.
This way you can pass the buck. If you keep everybody stupid you can tell them how to vote. Liberal leaders any- where in our military is the destruction of all that is good. Deep in your heart you know I am right. Yes
Senator Goodwater said that, and he was right.
Referring to enlisted men as an E grade is BS. What would the Officer say if we referred to them as 01,or 05? How many times have you heard have that E-5, or E-6 come and see me? Shame on you NCO¹s for allowing such disrespect. On the other hand how many times have you heard the term LT? There are no LT¹s in the Army. They are Lieutenants. This is also disrespectful. There are no tops in the Army. They are ISG¹s. Shame on senior NCO¹s that allow these things to occur. We are responsible for enforcing standards, and discipline. As SMA I would set the example for others to follow. This has a ripple down effect. Respect is earned through doing. Talk is cheap. If I had not lead by example I would not write my feelings on this issue. Those of us that have served realize that we attained our accomplishments because of the leaders above our peers, our subordinates, and us. When you start believing you advanced on your own you have a problem. We advance because of the good soldiers around us. To be a leader you have to have followers. Sorry leaders don¹t have followers. You can be an E grade or a NCO. Take the example from leaders who train for war.
Learn also from the bad ones on what never to be. I have pointed out just a few things that I would recommend for change. There are many more pressing issues that I would make recommendations on such as pay, and benefits. I would like to compliment the SMA on that issue. All have pressed hard on those issues and I am sure on many other issues involving the enlisted soldier. The NCO CORP is the back- bone of the Army. It is the back- bone of the Military. If you are allowing the Officers to perform your duty shame on you and shame on you SGM¹s for allowing that to happen. The military is the last bastion of moral standards left in our nation. You had better wake up because the liberals have just about completely destroyed those standards.
Remember you have one large mission, and that¹s to train soldiers for war.
This covers a broad spectrum, and it takes your total devotion to God, country, and family. Your leadership instills that moral character of right, and wrong so DO IT RIGHT! This mission is not for the weak, or the faint hearted. No I am not plagiarizing. I put that on the 4th Ranger Training BN sign. Lets be an ARMY of WARRIORS!
CSM Don Purdy USA RET
------------------------------------------------------------ Out of every 100 men, ten shouldn't even be there, Eighty are just targets, Nine are the real fighters, and we are lucky to have them, for they make the battle. Ah, but the one, one is a warrior, and he will bring the others back." - Hericletus, circa 500 BC ----------------------------------------------------------- 
|
|
|
|
|
Seasoned Vet
 
Group: Past PNET Supporter
Last Login: 9/7/2005 7:22 PM
Posts: 6,666,
Visits: 289
|
|
quote:
If there is anything you liberals hate is any form of discipline, and having anyone know the difference between right, and wrong. You are comfortable in the gray murky area where you can put band- aids on every thing, control the way people speak, and lets all be equally screwed up.
This way you can pass the buck. If you keep everybody stupid you can tell them how to vote. Liberal leaders any- where in our military is the destruction of all that is good
Do you care to comment on that Opforlt?
|
|
|
|
|
Seasoned Vet
Group: Past PNET Supporter
Last Login: 10/25/2008 8:48 PM
Posts: 3,380,
Visits: 1,309
|
|
Why Delta, I believe the Purd would hurt young opforlt's feelings with that anti-liberal bias he is projecting, but he says it like it is and he will tell you what is...IS! It is actually a scary thought but right now the Army needs someone like CSM Purdy to grab it by the horns and wrestle it away from political correctness and the Army of One B.S. that it is now mired in.
[82nd][E7][uswingm]
Stand in the door!
|
|
|
|
|
Seasoned Vet
Group: Past PNET Supporter
Last Login: 9/7/2005 7:22 PM
Posts: 6,666,
Visits: 289
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by JMPMASTR
Why Delta, I believe the Purd would hurt young opforlt's feelings with that anti-liberal bias he is projecting, but he says it like it is and he will tell you what is...IS! It is actually a scary thought but right now the Army needs someone like CSM Purdy to grab it by the horns and wrestle it away from political correctness and the Army of One B.S. that it is now mired in.
Roger That!!! I agree with SGM Purdy 110%. I remember him from Ranger School. He inspired me then. I would love to see him brought back from retirement to be the SMA.
|
|
|
|
|
Hard Charger
Group: Past PNET Supporter
Last Login: 8/22/2005 9:55 PM
Posts: 2,309,
Visits: 6
|
|
That is an absolute motivating speech right there,CSM Purdy is a true Leader,we need more like him.
The First thing I'll discuss are the five points of performance
|
|
|
|
|
Detachment Sergeant
Group: Past PNET Supporter
Last Login: 8/7/2008 5:06 PM
Posts: 3,684,
Visits: 680
|
|
quote:
I would love to see him brought back from retirement to be the SMA.
SMA WOULD be nice. However, I think that a man of such astute vision needs to be the new Secretary of the Army!
 ALWAYS OUT FRONT
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |