X-ray Tech gets his Ranger Tab
Paratrooper.net Commo Room
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
        


«««23456»»»

X-ray Tech gets his Ranger Tab Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 3/12/2006 9:29 AM


BS6's Dude

BS6's Dude

Group: Community Supporter
Last Login: 12/13/2009 8:47 PM
Posts: 3,051, Visits: 4,298
As a guy in a medical unit, I'd sure as hell like to have a few more Joes with experience like Ranger School to draw on when it comes time to prep for possible deployments.

As far as this Soldier "taking" a slot away from others - I dunno about that one for sure.  I haven't been to Ranger school and I don't know if all the slots get filled, but I do know this - The reason the NG units don't get the slots isn't because Active Duty CS/CSS troops are "taking" slots from them.  The NG budgets and forecasts slots each year, and they are assigned DEDICATED slots in Ranger school and other courses like it.

Having said that, there are ways to convert/transition AD slots to the Reserves/NG.  Unit training NCOs should look in to those options.

Congrats to this new Ranger!   



Post #192231
Posted 3/12/2006 10:22 AM


Airborne Grandpa

Airborne Grandpa

Group: Community Supporter
Last Login: Today @ 5:53 PM
Posts: 1,805, Visits: 1,829
Paul when we went to siani in 81 we got to send three E-6's to Ranger school but no E-5's damn it

MIKE LANSAW        

 

Post #192238
Posted 3/12/2006 5:42 PM


Regular Joe

Regular JoeRegular JoeRegular JoeRegular JoeRegular JoeRegular JoeRegular JoeRegular Joe

Group: Registered User
Last Login: 11/3/2009 4:08 PM
Posts: 434, Visits: 663
I say congrats to the x-ray tech for stepping up and taking the challenge.  Now ruck-up and lets go.  Only the future will determine wether or not the slot was "wasted" on him.  We all have seen good and bad examples of people wearing the tab.  Lets wait and see.

Geronimo130

"U.S. Paratroopers offer the enemy maximum opportunity to give his life for his country."

"This is H37 adjust fire over"

Post #192254
Posted 3/12/2006 8:14 PM


OIF Veteran

OIF VeteranOIF VeteranOIF VeteranOIF VeteranOIF VeteranOIF VeteranOIF VeteranOIF Veteran

Group: Past PNET Supporter
Last Login: 1/31/2010 2:43 PM
Posts: 3,900, Visits: 24,874
The only way you will see that guy "ruck up and go" is if he reclasses to a combat arms MOS.  Lets quit BSing ourselves.


Post #192265
Posted 3/13/2006 5:06 AM
Hard Charger

Hard ChargerHard ChargerHard ChargerHard ChargerHard ChargerHard ChargerHard ChargerHard Charger

Group: Past PNET Supporter
Last Login: Yesterday @ 6:19 AM
Posts: 1,995, Visits: 2,343
The only posts that are overboard are when they start getting personal. Of course they may be less informed, like mine, but hey I can live with myself.

No one here bashed the x ray tech, just the policies that got him there. As far as an Infantry second lieutenant raking leaves for seven months waiting for a school slot, there is definitely something wrong with that, and it has nothing to do with some ordinance officers going to School or an X ray tech going to to school.

The system doesn't work to everyone's needs and it could definitely be better. Maybe they should only allow CS/CSS soldiers who are deploying within 12 months to attend. But to eliminate them totally is not the answer. One answer might be to incorporate the course as a part of IOBC, and if a candidate doesn't make through the Ranger phase, he goes to his BN. I am sure there is an innovative way to make it better.

Post #192283
Posted 3/13/2006 9:29 AM


OIF Veteran

OIF VeteranOIF VeteranOIF VeteranOIF VeteranOIF VeteranOIF VeteranOIF VeteranOIF Veteran

Group: Past PNET Supporter
Last Login: 1/31/2010 2:43 PM
Posts: 3,900, Visits: 24,874
I'll give you innovative...RS slots only to combat arms joes who are deploying and really need the skill.  TOO far above my pay grade but thats what I would implement.


Post #192311
Posted 3/13/2006 9:54 AM


Stetson wearing staff puke

Stetson wearing staff puke

Group: Community Supporter
Last Login: 1/6/2010 12:26 PM
Posts: 1,664, Visits: 3,074
I agree that the argument that his slot was wasted is an invalid point.  It's not like there is a single list of names for ranger school; slots are allocated to all different branches, services, etc.  Is the ranger slot given to a Marine a waste too; because they're not in the fight necessarily with Army troops?  How far will this break down? 

I don't know the date when CS/CSS troops started going back to Ranger School, but for the good part of the last 8-10 years or so, it has been solely a combat arms school.  I'm assuming that with the changing mission and the need for the type of leadership training ranger school provides, it was deemed needed in the CS/CSS world.

Finally, several folks have assumed away the X-ray tech's chance of deploying, or being in a position of needing Ranger School.  What about the branch detailed LT, who starts out as infantry, gets tabbed, but then two years later gets transfered to, say Med Service or the Ordnance Corps?  Was that a wasted slot?  Hypothetical scenario, but it's a bit unfair to predict if he will use his training.  I think any of us could walk on a base and find tabbed guys with a bare right shoulder.

Blacksmith Six



OIF 09-10, 1st Cavalry Division

Post #192316
Posted 3/13/2006 11:02 AM


Ei Temporis Vita Semper Resumo Sese

Ei Temporis Vita Semper Resumo Sese

Group: Moderators
Last Login: Today @ 11:15 AM
Posts: 8,884, Visits: 8,304
What is taught at Ranger school is used by infantry personnel every time they gear up for a trip to either the back-40 or for a deployment... In the training enviroment alone the skills and techniques are passed on to subordinates and peers to improve their tactical and technical competance. Lasting squad and platoon SOPs are established which long outlive the Ranger qualified soldier's assignment to the organization. The focus, confidence, and experience fostered by graduates of Ranger school pays off in spades when the training transitions to real world enviroments and such personnel are truly combat multipliers.

Non combat personnel, such as X-ray technicians... no matter how hooah they are mind and body, are not going to be firing shots in anger unless it's in a totally desperate situation and the higher ups have made a severe and critical error. Even in such a worse-case scenario, such personnel will not be conducting aggresive operations such as patrols, ambushes, and raids period.

There are more candidates then there are slots for Ranger school at the moment so the argument that people not getting slots because of perceived failures with their schools NCO is a moot and invalid... Men who would be utilizing the unique training and leadership skills learned there from the moment they graduate are waiting in line... which makes the idea of slots going to somebody who has no immediate use for the training... and microscopic potential use for it in the future to attend the school is absurd at best. During peace time and if classes were being cancelled because of lack of students, then I could see support MOS being allowed to attend but we are at war and the school is maxed out with applicants.

I am definately not being a tab protector here in case some of you might wish to label me as such. I was still in service when the argument to disallow non essential troops from attending was in full swing and I can say there were some damned good reasons Ranger school was made available to specific MOS only... now it seems it is going to become fair game by the badge finder and ticket punching crowd once more... which will once again open the gates to downgraded standards and curriculum. Remember Ranger stakes? They were cut out because too many support MOS types failed to pass them the last time the course was made available to the general military public. I could go on about other aspects of the course that changed in those days but that'll just piss some of you off so I won't bother.

 

"The degenerative and loony should never be denigrated but, rather, thanked. In their absence, the rest of you would be obliged to fill congressional seats... positions naturally unsavory to the sane and honorable."

Thorax


Post #192329
Posted 3/13/2006 11:28 AM


Malignant Narcissist

Malignant Narcissist

Group: Community Supporter
Last Login: 12/29/2009 6:48 AM
Posts: 2,711, Visits: 1,847
I did a bit of digging...

There are almost 300 students waiting to attend the basic interrogation school in Ft. Huachuca.  There are simply not enough instructors to give out quality training without watering it down.  There are even sources that say the Intelligence Center had some issues with the hiring of house-wives of soldiers (with no training or experience in HUMINT collection or management) in order to meet the training need so the Army could get HUMINT collectors on the ground.  Looking at this thread in that context, I would have to agree that we should save those RS slots for combat arms soldiers; at least for the forseeable future.  We cannot afford to cheapen this training to get the numbers of graduates up; ergo, we should send those that could use the skills NOW.  With long lines at both schools, it would seem to be a systematic problem that is Army wide. 

Just my .223 though....

Do you listen to yourself when you talk; or do you just fade in and out?

Post #192331
Posted 3/13/2006 1:20 PM
Hard Charger

Hard ChargerHard ChargerHard ChargerHard ChargerHard ChargerHard ChargerHard ChargerHard Charger

Group: Past PNET Supporter
Last Login: Yesterday @ 6:19 AM
Posts: 1,995, Visits: 2,343
MILPER MESSAGE NUMBER : 05-067
AHRC-EPT-T
EXPANSION OF RANGER SCHOOL ATTENDANCE TO COMBAT SUPPORT (CS) AND COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT (CSS) BRANCHES
...Issued: [03/09/2005]...



A. AR 350-1, Army Training and Education, dated 9 Apr 03.

B.  DA Pamphlet 351-4, US Army Formal Schools Catalog, dated 31 Oct 95.

C.  Memorandum, Chief of Staff, Army, subject: Expansion of Ranger School Attendance to Combat Support (CS) and Combat Service Support (CSS) Branches, dated 31 Jan 05.

1. The purpose of this message is to announce the expansion and provide implementation guidance of the United States Army Ranger School Attendance to Combat Support (CS) and Combat Service Support (CSS) branches.

2. The Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) created many new challenges for our Army.  Traditional branch roles on the battlefield are no longer the norm for our forces and the threat facing us today requires that we ensure additional select leaders of CS and CSS units receive the unique skills taught at Ranger School. The Chief of Staff, Army has approved select CS and CSS Soldiers for enrollment into Ranger School.  Attendance at Ranger school will remain limited to Soldiers for whom the combat exclusion policy does not apply.  The following outlines the specific steps and actions for Soldiers requesting attendance at Ranger School.

a. Soldiers will submit a request containing a DA Form 4187 and Airborne/Ranger physical through the first LTC/05 in the Chain of Command to Installation DPTM/G3s.  Soldiers who attend a locally conducted pre-Ranger course (or equivalent) or are Airborne qualified will be more favorably considered than those who do not.  

b. Commanders will ensure that Soldiers meet the prerequisites outlined in Table 3-6, DA Pam 351-4 and Chapter 4, AR 351-1 before approving and forwarding recommendation.

c. DPTM/G3s will approve and submit DA 4187 as an A1 application utilizing the Army Training Requirements and Resources System (ATRRS) to WD quota source for enlisted and WA quota source for officers.

d. For installations and units without ATRRS access, applications for officers may be submitted for voluntary Ranger School attendance by submission of a packet containing a DA Form 4187 and Airborne/Ranger Physical through their chain of command to Commander, US Army Human Resources Command (HRC), ATTN:  (AHRC-OPL-L), 200 Stovall Street, Alexandria, VA 22332, Director Leader Development, ATTN: Mr. Ricardo Rivera [FAX: (703) 325-3242] for consideration. Enlisted Soldiers may submit requests for voluntary Ranger school attendance by submitting a request containing a DA Form 4187 and Airborne/Ranger Physical through their chain of command to the approval authority which is Commander, HRC (AHRC-EPT-T), 2461 Eisenhower Ave, Alexandria, VA 22332, or faxed to Specialized Training Management Branch ATTN: Mr. Jesse Bailey [FAX: (703) 325-4590] for consideration.  On all DA Forms 4187, a statement from the Commander verifying that the Soldier meets all prerequisites IAW AR 350-1 and DA Pam 351-4 will be included.  

e. Funding to support temporary duty (TDY) and return is the responsibility of the unit of assignment and is chargeable to unit OPTEMPO indirect, TDY to school account.  Travel orders will direct government housing (Barracks and direct government meals, seven days per week.  Travel orders must be prepared per HQDA guidance at
http://www.hqda-odcsops.army.mil. Fort Benning is under MTSS policy.

f. Soldiers who are on assignment instructions may apply for Ranger training.  If packet is approved, Soldiers will attend Ranger training in a TDY en route status.  Based on successful completion of Ranger training, the Soldier’s assignment may change.  

g. Soldiers who complete Ranger Training will be stabilized in their units for one year after completion of training.

h. Refer to AR 600-8-19 for special provisions regarding Ranger training and promotion.

3. POC for this message is Mr Jesse L. Bailey, (703)325-4585 (DSN 221), or Mr Ricardo Rivera, (703)325-3150 (DSN 221).

 

Post #192348
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

«««23456»»»

All times are GMT -7:00, Time now is 8:24pm

Powered By InstantForum.NET v4.1.4 © 2010
Execution: 0.875. 10 queries. Compression Disabled.