Two AF Members Blamed For $2M Mishap
Learn, Carry, Use, Live - Personal Survival Equipment and More for Plan B
Support the community!
Paratrooper.net Commo Room
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
        



Two AF Members Blamed For $2M Mishap Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 11/17/2003 10:27 PM


Seasoned Vet

Seasoned Vet

Group: Community Supporter
Last Login: Today @ 3:49 PM
Posts: 2,980, Visits: 5,497
How long would each of them have to re-up for to pay their share through payroll deductions?
Two AF Members Blamed For $2M Mishap

By Charlie Coon
Stars and Stripes
European edition
Monday, November 17, 2003
quote:
Two Air Force members have been blamed for an accident that caused more than $2 million of damage to a refueling plane on April 1 at RAF Akrotiri, Cyprus.

The plane’s co-pilot and a ground technician failed to check if the front landing gear was locked in place following routine maintenance of a KC-135R, according to a news release from the U.S. Air Forces in Europe.

The landing gear was not locked and retracted into the plane when the plane’s hydraulic pressure was applied, causing the aircraft to fall on its nose. The plane was in its parking place and the engines had not been started when the accident occurred.

The aircraft was deployed to Akrotiri to provide refueling in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, according to the release. While there, it was attached to the 351st Expeditionary Air Refueling Squadron, 401st Air Expeditionary Wing.

The plane was assigned to the 100th Air Refueling Wing at RAF Mildenhall, England. The findings were made by the U.S. Air Force Accident Investigation Board, the release stated.

According to the accident report, a guidance and controls system technician failed to lock the landing gear into place following maintenance, which violated a required procedure. The board also found that the plane’s co-pilot failed to verify the landing gear was locked in place, which he was required to do.

The two airmen were not named in the press release. Capt. Shane Balken of the Mildenhall public affairs office said Thursday that no action had yet been taken against the two airmen. He said he could not elaborate on the prospective punishments.

The accident caused the two inboard-engine cowlings — or engine covers — to come in contact with the ground. The damage was estimated at $2,100,437. Except for damage to the plane, there was no property damage or injuries caused by the accident, according to the release.

Balken said pre-flight inspections are made prior to every flight and are done by both maintenance and aircrew personnel.

Balken said the landing-gear lever had been moved to the up — or unlocked — position to facilitate maintenance. It was not returned to the down — or locked — position following the maintenance.

Both the technician and copilot are required to check the position of the landing-gear lever as part of their pre-flight responsibilities.

http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=18762



"I think men who have a pierced ear are better prepared for marriage. . . . . .
They've experienced pain and bought jewelry."

Post #14368
Posted 11/17/2003 10:35 PM


President for Life

President for Life

Group: Moderators
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 6:28 PM
Posts: 5,169, Visits: 5,483
IIRC, 3 months is the max for for Statement of Charges!!




The Second Amendment - America's Homeland Defense

All Your Base are Belong to Us

Profile for Ertman110

Think Big Foundation - Operation Ward 57
Post #70000
Posted 11/18/2003 3:31 PM


BS6's Dude

BS6's Dude

Group: Community Supporter
Last Login: 12/10/2008 4:45 PM
Posts: 3,050, Visits: 4,292
Geez... That's what happens when you get arrogant and quit following the checklists...

Dumba$$es!



 
Post #70001
Posted 11/18/2003 6:09 PM


Regular Joe

Regular Joe

Group: Community Supporter
Last Login: 12/17/2008 7:58 PM
Posts: 322, Visits: 1,471
Hey, zoomy AF guys, isn't there supposed to be a "weight on wheels" switch to keep this from happening?

militarysignatures.com
Post #70002
Posted 11/18/2003 11:49 PM


Green GI

Green GIGreen GIGreen GIGreen GIGreen GIGreen GIGreen GIGreen GI

Group: Registered User
Last Login: 6/5/2008 11:31 AM
Posts: 41, Visits: 142
Can't speak for the KC-135 as I am not that familiar, but on a C-130, the "squat switch" SHOULD prevent any powered hydraulic landing gear retraction. I would think that a requirement for a down-and-locked indication (handle down, three little tires showing with power on) should be in the referenced in the beginning of all inspection work cards as part of the "Equipment Condition" section. I would bet that there is even a job guide task and subtask reference for "aircraft parked and secured I.A.W..." or some such. C-130s have a ratchet handle and socket stowed behind a seat standard that can be used for a manual extension/retraction of the MLG if need be. 130's also have windows into the wheelwells that allow the FE to visually confirm a down-and-locked condition absent of any indication on the flight deck. You can bet those maintainers were de-certified on just about any task involving an aircraft having wheels. If the investigation shows that the incident was a result of failure to follow technical data, somebodys career will likely suffer irrepairable damage.

There are two rules to success in life...

Rule #1: Don't tell people everything you know.

Post #70004
Posted 11/19/2003 3:33 PM


Air Force Liaison/P.Net Original Cast of Characters

Air Force Liaison/P.Net Original Cast of Characters

Group: Community Supporter
Last Login: Today @ 4:30 PM
Posts: 3,425, Visits: 9,098
Stupid Air Force pukes..........not that I've never bent any airplane metal. That anyone knows about.

Big Al!

LOAD CLEAR! LOAD CLEAR!

Your Job is my Hobby!

 

Post #70005
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »


All times are GMT -7:00, Time now is 7:52pm

Powered By InstantForum.NET v4.1.4 © 2009
Execution: 0.328. 10 queries. Compression Disabled.