No Charges For Pilots - One Request Courts Martial
Combat Casuals, High Speed Low Drag Embroidery
Support the community!
Paratrooper.net Commo Room
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
        


««12

No Charges For Pilots - One Request Courts Martial Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 6/25/2003 7:46 PM


Seasoned Vet

Seasoned Vet

Group: Registered User
Last Login: Today @ 9:55 AM
Posts: 2,957, Visits: 5,306
In an "all or nothing" move, Major Harry Schmidt opted not to accept an Article 15, and asked that he be brought up on the major charges through the courts martial process:
'Friendly-Fire' Pilot Granted Court Martial

Last Updated Wed, 25 Jun 2003
20:26:59
MIDDLETOWN, VA.

quote:
The U.S. pilot who mistakenly bombed Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan last year has turned down an air force offer of lesser charges and will face a court martial.

It's a high-stakes gamble for Maj. Harry Schmidt. He could be exonerated of the charges he faces or end up with a prison term of up to 64 years.

A military spokesperson confirmed the air force had accepted Schmidt's request, but had not set a date for the trial.

"Maj. Schmidt's trial date has not yet been established. The Air Force Trial Judiciary's Central Circuit will assign a trial judge and a trial date in the near future," said a statement from Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana.

Last week, an air force officer who reviewed the case recommended against court martial for Schmidt and Maj. William Umbach, the other pilot involved in the bombing.

FROM JUNE 19, 2003: 'Friendly fire' pilots won't be court-martialed

Schmidt dropped a 225-kilogram bomb on a group of Canadian soldiers in April 2002, killing four of them and injuring eight others.

His lawyers said Wednesday Schmidt wants the military trial to address the more serious charges he was facing.

"It is clear that I cannot and will not receive a full and fair hearing" in a non-judicial hearing known as an Article 15, Schmidt said in a statement.

"Therefore I am compelled to refuse punishment under Article 15 and demand trial by court martial," he said.

If found guilty on the most serious possible charges – aggravated assault, involuntary manslaughter and dereliction of duty – Schmidt could face up to 64 years in prison.

Schmidt's other option was a non-judicial hearing on charges of dereliction of duty. The hearing could have tarnished his record and ended his career.

http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2003/06/25/friendly_fire030625


Post #69053
Posted 6/25/2003 7:52 PM


President for Life

President for Life

Group: Moderators
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 9:45 PM
Posts: 5,167, Visits: 5,463
To quote TOP GUN

"Be lucky to be flying rubber dog **** outta Hong Kong!!"

Their careers are over!!

"F"ing fighter jocks need to get their wings clipped.



The Second Amendment - America's Homeland Defense

All Your Base are Belong to Us

Profile for Ertman110

Think Big Foundation - Operation Ward 57
Post #69054
Posted 6/25/2003 9:06 PM


Ei Temporis Vita Semper Resumo Sese

Ei Temporis Vita Semper Resumo Sese

Group: Moderators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 11:18 AM
Posts: 8,486, Visits: 7,601
Maybe it was because they either knew I was the one who kept their critical flight components working or my previous military background... but I've never had a run in with an overly egotistical fighter pilot. Sure... they have attitude, they've got to... just like a young stud in the 75th needs to... but just like that Ranger hooah, the motivation comes from having 100% confidence in your abilitys. Now.... SP's on the other hand...

 

"The degenerative and loony should never be denigrated but, rather, thanked. In their absence, the rest of you would be obliged to fill congressional seats... positions naturally unsavory to the sane and honorable."

Thorax


Post #69055
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

««12

All times are GMT -7:00, Time now is 1:10pm

Powered By InstantForum.NET v4.1.4 © 2008
Execution: 0.688. 9 queries. Compression Disabled.